english
français
RP2E INRA Université de Lorraine

Publications

Divergent geographic patterns of genetic diversity among wild bees: Conservation implications

Diversity and Distributions, 24 (12), pp. 1860-1868.

Lecocq, T., Michez, D., Gérard, M., Vereecken, N.J., Delangre, J., Rasmont, P., Vray, S., Dufrêne, M., Mardulyn, P., Dellicour, S.

2018

Aim Genetic diversity is a key factor to species survival. This diversity is unevenly distributed across the species range, delimiting genetic diversity hotspots (GDH). Focusing conservation efforts on regions where GDH of several species overlap (i.e., multispecies GDH) could rationalize conservation efforts by protecting several taxa in one go. However, recent studies suggest the existence of many species?specific GDH. This would make spatially prioritizing protection even more challenging as it requires the integration of these multiple GDH rather than few hotspots into conservation planning. Here, we characterize GDH of nine co?distributed bee species through an original comparative mapping approach to assess the suitability of a spatial prioritization strategy to protect their genetic diversity. Location We studied bee populations from Europe. Methods First, we used a sliding window approach to estimate the nucleotide diversity and its geographic distribution to highlight GDH of each species. Second, we assessed the overlap of GDH between species by generating consensus maps based on the species?specific maps of nucleotide diversity. Third, we used the GDH distribution patterns to identify the extent of cost?effective area network that would be needed to protect genetic diversity of all nine species. Results Genetic diversity was unevenly distributed across species ranges, but we found no evidence of a large overlap among GDH from all species. Cost?effective area network needed to protect genetic diversity of all species spreads over several large geographic areas including regions under high human development pressures. Main conclusions Genetic diversity hotspots' location is species?specific. Therefore, focusing conservation efforts strictly on the few regions harbouring GDH for many bee species is unlikely to be sufficient to ensure long?term persistence of all species. Conservation actions should be implemented simultaneously in different regions according to a complementary?based conservation approach, to optimize the conservation of all bee diversity.

Imprimer le document

Voir le document sur le site de l'éditeur

214 Publications depuis 2014

Imprimer le listing

2019

ACL - Articles comité de lecture référencés bases de données HCÉRES

ACLN - Articles comité de lecture non-référencés bases de données HCÉRES

2018

ACL - Articles comité de lecture référencés bases de données HCÉRES

ACLN - Articles comité de lecture non-référencés bases de données HCÉRES

2017

ACL - Articles comité de lecture référencés bases de données HCÉRES

ACLN - Articles comité de lecture non-référencés bases de données HCÉRES

2016

ACL - Articles comité de lecture référencés bases de données HCÉRES

2015

ACL - Articles comité de lecture référencés bases de données HCÉRES

ACLN - Articles comité de lecture non-référencés bases de données HCÉRES

2014

ACL - Articles comité de lecture référencés bases de données HCÉRES

ACLN - Articles comité de lecture non-référencés bases de données HCÉRES

Voir les productions antérieures

Toutes les productions scientifiques